Critque "The Creation story, The Flood story & The Sabbath is recorded throughout the world in almost all ancient cultures"

1. “The Creation story, The Flood story & The Sabbath is recorded throughout the world in almost all ancient cultures.”

Ah yes, the old “every culture has a flood story, therefore the Bible must be true” fallacy — one of the oldest tricks in the apologetic playbook. By that logic, since almost every ancient culture also has dragon myths, trickster gods, and sky-fathers throwing lightning bolts, we should conclude that Smaug, Loki, and Zeus were also historical figures.

What this actually demonstrates is not divine confirmation, but the shared psychology of early humanity. When you live near rivers that flood, you invent flood stories. When you stare at the sky and wonder where you came from, you invent creation stories. And when you want to regulate your tribe’s time and rest, you invent sacred days — whether it’s a Sabbath, a Saturnalia, or a Solstice.

It’s the universality of human imagination, not the fingerprint of divine revelation. Mythic patterns repeat because human beings do — not because the Hebrew version just happens to be the one true cosmology.

---

2. “It appears that the physical evidence matches what was recorded in the Bible.”

This is the claim that dies the moment you look at any actual evidence.
The “physical evidence” points, with crushing indifference, in the opposite direction.

There is no sign of a global flood — no continuous sedimentary layer, no universal extinction pattern, no population bottleneck. Every coral reef, ice core, and tree ring quietly mocks this claim by being hundreds of thousands of years older than Genesis allows.

Creationists often pretend that geological evidence “fits” the Flood if you squint hard enough and ignore 99% of the data. But science is not interpretive dance. The fossils are ordered precisely as evolutionary theory predicts — fish before amphibians before reptiles before mammals before humans — not churned together like soup after some worldwide deluge.

As for creation, the “physical evidence” shows a universe that began 13.8 billion years ago, stars forming long before Earth, and life arising through evolutionary processes over billions of years. Every atom in your body, except hydrogen, was forged in stars — a poetic truth infinitely grander than Bronze Age cosmology.

The Bible’s cosmology — a flat earth under a dome of firmament, with the sun and moon as lamps — is not “confirmed” by physics. It’s refuted by it. The only way the evidence “matches” Scripture is if you start with the conclusion and work backward through willful blindness.

---

3. “There are fewer records of many ancient emperors and most famous historical leaders than of Jesus by a factor of 100, yet people willingly accept them.”

This is a masterpiece of misdirection. The argument assumes that the existence of Jesus equals the truth of Christian claims about him. No serious historian denies that an apocalyptic Jewish preacher probably existed — any more than we deny that Socrates did. The problem is not the “existence” of a man named Yeshua. It’s the extravagant supernatural claims built around him — virgin births, water-walking, resurrection, and all — for which there is no contemporary evidence whatsoever.

The “records” of Jesus are not Roman archives, inscriptions, or official accounts — they’re anonymous gospels written decades later, copied from one another, full of contradictions, and clearly embroidered with myth. That’s not historical attestation; that’s theological marketing.

Meanwhile, the “ancient emperors” — like Augustus, Tiberius, or Alexander — are confirmed by coins, inscriptions, architecture, legal documents, and independent chroniclers. To say Jesus has more historical evidence than them is like saying there’s more evidence for Sherlock Holmes than for Winston Churchill, because more people have read The Hound of the Baskervilles.

---

Conclusion

This triumvirate of claims is a museum of fallacies:

• Argument from popularity (“many cultures have similar stories”)

• Argument from selective evidence (“the facts fit the Bible—if you ignore most of them”)

• False equivalence (“Jesus is as well-attested as emperors”)