Wednesday, October 29, 2025

Reclaiming the prophet, Ellen White, chapter reviews, critique and summary

 Summary of Chapter One – “Ellen White Was a Woman” (by Terrie Dopp Aamodt)

from Reclaiming the Prophet: Ellen White and the Future of Adventism


Overview:
This chapter presents Ellen G. White as both a profoundly human and an extraordinary religious figure—a woman navigating 19th-century gender constraints while shaping a global religious movement. Aamodt traces her evolution from a frail, injured Maine teenager to the prophetic and organizational core of early Seventh-day Adventism. The chapter stresses how Ellen White’s gender, often perceived as a limitation, paradoxically became a source of moral authority and spiritual power.


1. A Daughter and Sister

Ellen Harmon (later White) was born in 1827, the youngest of eight children and the twin of Elizabeth. Her Methodist parents, Robert and Eunice Harmon, were early followers of William Miller’s apocalyptic preaching. A childhood accident left Ellen physically weakened and emotionally sensitive, shaping both her spirituality and self-image.

Her mother guided her toward a personal sense of faith, and Ellen’s first public prayer at age 14 showed early spiritual courage. Her teenage visions, beginning at 17, scandalized some but inspired others. In an era when women were expected to remain silent in public religious life, Ellen began traveling—defying convention—to share her visionary experiences.

Her relationships with siblings reveal deep family affection and tragedy: she lost her brother Robert Jr. young, and later tried to convert her other sisters to Adventism. A moving scene late in their father’s life shows Ellen preaching for him and her sisters, demonstrating her role as both dutiful daughter and spiritual leader.


2. A Wife

Ellen’s marriage to James White in 1846 created one of the most influential partnerships in American religious history. He was a dynamic editor and organizer; she was a visionary and preacher. Together they built Adventist doctrine, publications, and institutions.

Yet their relationship was often turbulent. Ellen’s “locked mind” during early doctrinal debates gave way to visions that resolved theological disputes, earning her prophetic status even as critics doubted a woman’s authority.

After James’s strokes in 1865, Ellen became his nurse and motivator—her strength sustaining him through long recovery periods. The chapter recounts her ingenuity (such as tricking neighbors into refusing help so James would regain confidence) and her efforts to balance devotion with independence.

Their later years saw serious marital tension. Letters reveal Ellen’s frustration with James’s controlling temperament and his struggle to accept her spiritual authority. At times, she lived and worked separately, asserting that God had given them “each our work.” Yet despite conflict, they reconciled before James’s death in 1881. Ellen’s grief was profound: she felt her life had been “so interwoven” with his that she could scarcely imagine going on—but she eventually did, becoming a powerful solo leader.


3. A Mother

Motherhood was the sphere where Ellen’s prophetic vocation and human vulnerability collided most painfully. Constant travel for ministry forced her to leave her young children—Henry, Edson, Willie, and baby John Herbert—in the care of others. She believed her divine calling took precedence, though she agonized over the separations and feared divine punishment if she put family above duty.

Her early writings show both maternal tenderness and a severe theology of obedience. She interpreted the deaths of two sons (Henry and John Herbert) through a tragic lens of sacrifice and testing. Domestic instability, unreliable caretakers, and relentless travel left her feeling guilty and misunderstood by neighbors.

Despite these struggles, she worked tirelessly—preaching, writing, sewing, and raising her remaining children. Her honesty about maternal exhaustion and emotional conflict offers a rare glimpse into a 19th-century woman balancing public ministry with private grief.


Core Themes

  • Gender and Power: Ellen White’s authority emerged through, not despite, her womanhood. Her “frailty” became proof of divine strength.

  • Partnership and Independence: The marriage to James White blended cooperation and competition, shaping early Adventist leadership.

  • Spiritual Vocation vs. Domestic Duty: Aamodt highlights Ellen’s lifelong tension between prophetic calling and maternal expectation.

  • Humanity of a Prophet: The chapter reclaims Ellen White not as a saintly icon but as a complex, emotionally candid woman whose struggles mirror the contradictions of her era.


In essence:
Aamodt’s first chapter restores Ellen White’s humanity. She was a 19th-century woman negotiating pain, love, family, and faith while becoming a theological voice in a male-dominated world. Her weakness—physical, emotional, social—became the unlikely vessel of her prophetic power.

Wednesday, October 8, 2025

Genesis creation stories mistakenly used as evidence ( excuse typos as early attempt )

 

Three Myths That Won’t Die: Creation, the Flood, and the ‘Evidence for Jesus’

A Hitchens-style demolition of pseudohistory and pious wish-thinking.

1. “The Creation story, The Flood story & The Sabbath are recorded throughout the world in almost all ancient cultures.”

Claim: The Bible must be true because many cultures have similar stories.

Reality: Similar myths don’t prove a shared event — they prove shared human psychology.

“If every tribe has a flood story, it’s because every tribe lived near a river.” — Hitchens

Humans across the world have always tried to explain natural disasters and the mystery of existence. Floods, creation, and sacred rest days appear everywhere — from Mesopotamia’s Atrahasis Epic to China’s Nuwa legend, to the Aztec flood myths. These stories reflect common experience, not a single divine broadcast.

Caption: Shared experiences ≠ shared events.

2. “It appears that the physical evidence matches what was recorded in the Bible.”

Claim: Science supports the Genesis account.

Reality: The physical evidence does the opposite — loudly and repeatedly.

There is no sign of a global flood:

  • No single sedimentary layer spanning continents.

  • No universal extinction pattern.

  • Coral reefs, ice cores, and tree rings all show continuous growth far older than 4,000 years.

The world’s oldest coral reef? Over 400,000 years old.

The Greenland ice cores? Layered year by year back 800,000 years.

That alone sinks Noah’s boat without a drop of irony.

Caption: Reality is thicker than scripture.

And the Genesis creation story?

The evidence shows a 13.8-billion-year-old universe, 4.5-billion-year-old Earth, and a biological history stretching across billions of years of evolution.

Even the atoms in our bodies — carbon, oxygen, iron — were forged in ancient stars. In other words, we are literally made of stardust.

That’s not just more poetic than Genesis — it’s true.

“Religion invented man in its image. Science discovered that man was made of the stars.” — Paraphrasing Hitchens

Caption: You are older than Genesis.

3. “There are fewer records of many ancient emperors and famous leaders than of Jesus by a factor of 100.”

Claim: Jesus is better documented than emperors, so Christianity must be credible.

Reality: This is a sleight of hand — confusing myth-making with historical evidence.

Let’s be clear: there probably was a first-century Jewish preacher named Yeshua.

But that doesn’t mean he was divine, resurrected, or walked on water.

The “records” of Jesus are not contemporary documents — they’re anonymous gospel accounts written decades later, copied from one another, and riddled with contradictions. There are zero Roman or Jewish records from Jesus’s lifetime mentioning his miracles, trial, or resurrection.

Meanwhile, emperors like Augustus and Tiberius left coins, inscriptions, decrees, and architecture. That’s evidence. A gospel written forty years later is literature.

Caption: Faith ≠ evidence.

The Takeaway

Each of these claims collapses under scrutiny because they all rely on the same impulse — to start with a conclusion and work backward.

It’s the habit of belief rather than inquiry.

“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” — Christopher Hitchens

Ancient stories are beautiful windows into the human mind. But mistaking them for geology, cosmology, or biography is like mistaking a campfire tale for a weather report.

Science and history have moved on — only dogma remains stuck in the mud, shouting at the stars.

Caption: One is mythology. The other is reality — and infinitely more awe-inspiring.